Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningdecaycompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to trace is decay.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
Cayley's 1858 A memoir on the theory of matrices defined square arrays of numbers and the operations on them; within that algebra the trace of a square matrix is the sum of the entries on its main diagonal. This number also equals the sum of the matrix's eigenvalues and does not change when the basis is changed, which makes it a basic invariant of the linear map the matrix stands for. Here the referent is a single number read off a table of coefficients, and it has nothing to do with a stored memory, a faint chemical quantity, or the mark of an absent term.[1]
Semon's 1904 Die Mneme named the lasting physical change that an experience leaves in the nervous system the engram, the memory trace that can later be reactivated to reproduce something of the original experience. Josselyn and Tonegawa's 2020 Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future reviewed how particular populations of neurons hold such traces and how switching those neurons back on can drive recall. Here the referent is a durable change in living brain tissue that stores a memory, not a number from a matrix, a small chemical quantity, or a philosopher's mark of difference.[2][3]
Underwood's 1956 Trace elements in human and animal nutrition gathered the elements that occur in living tissue at very small concentrations, the trace elements such as iron, zinc, copper, and iodine, many of which are essential in tiny amounts yet harmful in excess. Fraga's 2005 Relevance, essentiality and toxicity of trace elements in human health reviewed how these low-concentration elements act in the body and where the line between too little and too much falls. Here a trace is a quantity of matter so small that it sits near the lower limit of what can be reliably measured, unlike a number from a matrix, a stored memory, or a mark of an absent term.[4][5]
Derrida's 1967 De la grammatologie (translated as Of Grammatology in 1976) used the trace for the way any element of language carries within it a mark of the other elements it is not, so that meaning depends on what is absent as much as on what is present. On this account no sign is fully self-contained: each one bears the trace of the differences that set it apart from every other. Here the referent is a structural mark of absence within a system of signs, and it is unrelated to a number from a matrix, a stored memory, or a faint chemical quantity.[6]
Next
See how trace sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct