Construct · 2 fields · 3 citations

Where does clause collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningsentencecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to clause is sentence.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

clause2 CONSTRUCTSGrammatical clauseHALLIDAY · CLAUSE UNITCNF/logic clauseDAVIS-PUTNAM · CNF UNIT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Linguistics and grammar

A predicate-based unit of syntax

In grammar, a clause is the basic unit of syntax organised around a predicate, usually a verb together with the participants and circumstances that go with it: a main (independent) clause can stand alone as a sentence, while a subordinate (dependent) clause is embedded within or attached to another. Halliday and Matthiessen's Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (2014) treats the clause as the central unit through which a language builds meaning, working at once as a message, as an exchange between speakers, and as a representation of some event. Here the referent is a structural unit of language defined by its predicate, not a numbered provision in a legal document or a row of symbols in a logical formula.[1]

Unit
One grammatical clause: a predicate with its associated elements, classed as main or subordinate
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by parsing a sentence into predicates and their dependents, then labelled by clause type and function

Logic and computer science

A disjunction of literals in CNF

In formal logic and computer science, a clause is a disjunction of literals, that is, a set of atomic statements and their negations joined by 'or', used as the building block of a formula in conjunctive normal form, in which the whole formula is a conjunction ('and') of such clauses. Davis and Putnam's A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory (1960) made the clause the object on which automated satisfiability procedures operate, and the special case of a Horn clause, with at most one positive literal, defined by Horn (1951), underlies logic programming and the language Prolog. The referent is an item in a symbolic formula manipulated by an algorithm, not a unit of natural-language grammar and not a provision of a legal document.[2][3]

Unit
One disjunction of literals: a clause in a conjunctive normal form formula
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Handled by a solver as a set of literals, tested for satisfiability and simplified by resolution or unit propagation

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how clause sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

grammar4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsresolution3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsargument3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
  2. Davis, M., & Putnam, H. (1960). A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the ACM, 7(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1145/321033.321034
  3. Horn, A. (1951). On sentences which are true of direct unions of algebras. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 16(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2268661

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct