Construct · 3 fields · 5 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningfacecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to pyramid is face.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A solid figure with a polygon for its base and triangular faces that meet at a single apex above the base: Euclid's Elements (around 300 BCE) treated the pyramid in Book XII and proved that its volume is one third of a prism standing on the same base with the same height. The figure is fixed entirely by its faces, edges, and vertices, with no reference to material or scale. This referent is an idealised shape in geometry, not the stone monument that gave it its name, the feeding diagram of an ecosystem, or a layer of a market.[1]
A diagram of a food chain in which each feeding level is drawn as a horizontal bar, stacked from many organisms or much energy at the base to few at the top: Charles Elton's 1927 Animal Ecology introduced the pyramid of numbers, the observation that animals grow scarcer at each step up the chain. Raymond Lindeman's 1942 paper The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology recast the picture in terms of energy, showing how much less energy reaches each higher feeding level. The referent is a quantitative summary of who eats whom in an ecosystem, unrelated to a stone monument, a geometric solid, or a market.[2][3]
The very large population of the world's poorest people, viewed as an untapped consumer market rather than only as aid recipients: C. K. Prahalad and Stuart Hart's 2002 article The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid argued that firms could serve billions of low-income customers profitably while raising their living standards. Ted London and Stuart Hart's 2004 paper Reinventing strategies for emerging markets refined the idea toward business models built with, not just for, poor communities. The referent is a layer of a global income distribution treated as a market, and it has nothing in common with a royal tomb, a geometric solid, or a food chain.[4][5]
Next
See how pyramid sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct