Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four fields Nearest construct by meaningcohesioncompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to text is cohesion.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In post-structuralist theory the text is not the printed work you hold but a field of meaning that opens up in the act of reading. Roland Barthes drew this line in From Work to Text: the work is a finished object on a shelf, while the text is something that happens when a reader engages it and cannot be pinned to a single settled meaning. On this view a text is woven from countless earlier writings and codes, so its meaning is plural and never fully closes. Jacques Derrida pressed a related point in the phrase often rendered 'there is no outside-text,' meaning there is no place to stand outside language from which to fix what a passage finally means. Here the referent is a way of reading and a space of signification, not a cohesive stretch of sentences, a statute a judge construes, or a string a program tokenizes.[1]
In text linguistics a text is a unit of language larger than the sentence: a stretch of writing or speech that hangs together as a whole rather than a list of unrelated lines. Michael Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan, in Cohesion in English, described the ties that make a text hold together, such as pronouns that point back to an earlier noun, linking words, and repeated or related vocabulary. These surface ties are cohesion; the deeper sense that the whole thing is about something and follows a line of thought is coherence. Robert de Beaugrande and Wolfgang Dressler later set out a fuller list of standards a piece of language meets to count as a text. Here the referent is an ordinary connected passage studied for how its parts bind together, not a space of endless signification, an enacted law, or a document fed to a model.[2]
In law the text is the enacted language itself: the exact words a legislature passed or a constitution sets down. Textualism is the view that a court reading a law should look first to the ordinary public meaning those words carried when they were enacted, rather than to the private intentions of the drafters or the outcome a judge would prefer. Antonin Scalia argued this case in A Matter of Interpretation, urging judges to read what the law says and not to hunt for an unwritten legislative purpose behind it. The claim is that the binding thing is the text a lawmaker actually enacted, which citizens can read, not the aims a court imputes to it. Here the referent is the operative words of a legal instrument as a court construes them, not a literary field of meaning, a linguistic unit, or a string to be processed.[3]
In natural language processing a text is data: a string of characters, or a document, that a program takes as input and turns into something it can compute over. The raw text is split into smaller pieces called tokens, and those tokens are mapped to numbers or vectors so that statistics and models can run on them. Justin Grimmer and Brandon Stewart, in Text as Data, laid out how large collections of documents can be analyzed automatically, while warning that these methods aid careful reading rather than replace it. On this view a text is the object of text mining, search, and the language models trained on huge document collections. Here the referent is a machine-readable string to be tokenized and embedded, not a literary field of meaning, a cohesive passage, or the enacted words of a law.[4]
Next
See how text sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct