Construct · 4 fields · 7 citations

Where does search collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningfrictioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to search is friction.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

search4 CONSTRUCTSLegal searchENTICK · UNLAWFUL SEARCHSearch theorySTIGLER · SEARCH COSTState-space searchHART · HEURISTIC SEARCHVisual searchTREISMAN · VISUAL SEARCH

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Law

A government intrusion into a protected area or expectation of privacy

In constitutional law a search is an act by the state that intrudes on a person, their property, or a space where they reasonably expect privacy, and which the law therefore constrains. The doctrine traces to Entick v. Carrington (1765), an English judgment holding that officers of the Crown could not seize a man's papers without lawful authority, a ruling later treated as a foundation of the Fourth Amendment. Katz v. United States (1967) set out the modern test, holding that the protection turns on a reasonable expectation of privacy rather than physical trespass alone. This referent is a legal event judged against a constitutional standard, not an algorithm exploring a state space, a buyer canvassing prices, or an eye scanning a display.[1][2]

Unit
A single act of state intrusion, judged lawful or unlawful against a constitutional standard
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed case by case by courts against the reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test and the warrant requirement

Economics

Costly information gathering in a frictional market

In economics search is the costly activity of gathering information about prices, wages, or trading partners when a market does not clear instantly and offers vary. Stigler's 1961 The economics of information first modelled this formally, showing that a buyer samples sellers up to the point where the expected gain from one more quotation equals its cost. The idea was later extended into the search theory of unemployment and matching by Mortensen and Pissarides, which explains why workers and jobs, or buyers and sellers, take time to pair up. This referent is an economic decision about how much to look before settling, not a court's finding, a computed path through a problem, or an eye locating a target.[3][4]

Unit
One agent's information-gathering effort, scaled by the cost and expected payoff of an additional inquiry
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Operationalised through reservation prices or reservation wages, offer-arrival rates, and the duration of search spells

Computer science

Systematic exploration of a state space for a solution

In artificial intelligence and computer science search is the systematic exploration of a space of possible states or configurations to find one that solves a problem. Hart, Nilsson, and Raphael's 1968 A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths gave the field its A* method, which uses an estimate of the remaining cost to guide the exploration toward a goal efficiently. Newell and Simon's 1976 Computer science as empirical inquiry set out the broader claim that intelligent action can be understood as search through a problem space by a symbol system. This referent is a computational procedure over abstract states, not a constitutional event, a shopper comparing offers, or a visual scan of a scene.[5][6]

Unit
One traversal of a state space, counted by the nodes expanded or states visited
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Evaluated by nodes expanded, time and memory used, path cost, and whether the method is complete and optimal

Psychology

Scanning a visual scene to locate a target among distractors

In cognitive psychology visual search is the task of scanning a display to find a target item among distractor items, used to probe how attention selects information. Treisman and Gelade's 1980 A feature-integration theory of attention showed that a target defined by a single feature seems to pop out at once, while a target defined by a combination of features must be examined item by item, so response time rises with the number of distractors. This referent is a perceptual and attentional process in a viewer, timed in milliseconds, not a legal intrusion, a market inquiry, or a computer's exploration of states.[7]

Unit
One search trial, from display onset to the observer's detection response
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Measured by reaction time and accuracy as a function of set size, yielding the search slope in milliseconds per item

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how search sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

information4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsattention5 fields · 10 citationsjingle · one name, five constructsfrontier3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Entick v. Carrington, 95 Eng. Rep. 807 (K.B. 1765).
  2. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
  3. Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/258464
  4. Mortensen, D. T., & Pissarides, C. A. (1994). Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297896
  5. Hart, P. E., Nilsson, N. J., & Raphael, B. (1968). A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136
  6. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19(3), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/360018.360022
  7. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct