Construct · 4 fields · 7 citations

Where does shift collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningswitchcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to shift is switch.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

shift4 CONSTRUCTSSound shiftGRIMM · SOUND SHIFTDoppler shiftDOPPLER · FREQUENCY SHIFTSet shiftingJERSILD · SET SHIFTINGParser shiftKNUTH · PARSER SHIFT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Historical linguistics

A regular change in speech sounds over time

A systematic, regular change in the pronunciation of a language's speech sounds over time, in which a whole class of sounds moves in the same direction. Jacob Grimm's 1822 Deutsche Grammatik described the first such regularity, the Germanic consonant shift later called Grimm's Law, in which inherited stops moved step by step; Otto Jespersen's 1909 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles named the Great Vowel Shift that reorganised English long vowels. Here the referent is a historical movement of sound patterns across a speech community, tracked across centuries, not a change in an observed frequency, a mental switch between tasks, or a step taken by a parser.[1][2]

Unit
One regular sound change affecting a whole class of sounds across a language
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Reconstructed by comparing related languages and dated word forms, tracing regular correspondences across historical stages

Physics and astronomy

A change in a wave's observed frequency from relative motion

A change in the observed frequency or wavelength of a wave caused by relative motion between the source and the observer, so that an approaching source appears higher and a receding one lower. Christian Doppler's 1842 Über das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne first predicted this effect for the light of stars; Edwin Hubble's 1929 A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae used the redshift of distant galaxies to show that the universe is expanding. The referent is a measurable displacement of a wave's frequency, read from a spectrum or a detector, and it has nothing to do with a change in how a language is pronounced, a switch of mental task, or an action in a parsing algorithm.[3][4]

Unit
A fractional change in a wave's frequency or wavelength between source and observer
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Read as the displacement of spectral lines or a beat frequency, scaled by the relative velocity divided by the wave speed

Cognitive psychology

The mental act of switching between tasks or rules

The mental operation of disengaging from one task or rule and reconfiguring to another, a core part of what lets people flexibly change what they are doing. Arthur Jersild's 1927 monograph Mental Set and Shift first measured the time cost of switching between alternating tasks; Akira Miyake and colleagues' 2000 study The unity and diversity of executive functions established shifting as one of three separable executive functions alongside updating and inhibition. The referent is an internal act of cognitive reconfiguration, timed by the delay it adds to a response, and it is distinct from a change in speech sounds, a Doppler change in a wave, or a move made by a parser.[5][6]

Unit
One switch from one task or mental rule to another
Recovery means
The added response time from a switch shrinks as the person settles into the new task
Measured by
Estimated as the switch cost, the extra reaction time on switch trials compared with repeat trials

Computer science

A parser action that pushes an input token onto the stack

In bottom-up parsing, the action of reading the next input symbol and pushing it onto the parser's stack, as opposed to reducing symbols already on the stack into a grammar rule. Donald Knuth's 1965 On the translation of languages from left to right formalised the LR parsing method in which each step is either a shift or a reduce, and a parsing table decides which action to take. The referent is a discrete step in an algorithm that moves a token from the input to a working stack, and it bears no relation to a change in pronunciation, a displacement of a wave's frequency, or a switch between mental tasks.[7]

Unit
One parser action moving a single input token onto the stack
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Counted as shift actions in a parse trace, or read from the shift entries of an LR parsing table

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how shift sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

frequency4 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsdrift5 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, five constructsparadigm3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Grimm, J. (1822). Deutsche Grammatik (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Dieterich.
  2. Jespersen, O. (1909). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part I: Sounds and Spellings. Carl Winter.
  3. Doppler, C. (1842). Über das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer Gestirne des Himmels. Abhandlungen der Königlich Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 2, 465–482.
  4. Hubble, E. (1929). A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15(3), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.3.168
  5. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 14(89), 5–82.
  6. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
  7. Knuth, D. E. (1965). On the translation of languages from left to right. Information and Control, 8(6), 607–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct