Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations

Where does spectrum collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningdispersioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to spectrum is dispersion.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

spectrum4 CONSTRUCTSOptical spectrumNEWTON · WAVELENGTHAutism spectrumWING & GOULD · DIMENSIONPolitical spectrumDOWNS · LEFT-RIGHTRadio spectrumMCMILLAN · LICENSED

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Physics (optics)

the band of colours a prism spreads white light into, and the distribution of radiation intensity across wavelength.

The band of colours a prism spreads white light into, and by extension the distribution of radiation intensity across wavelength or frequency. Newton reported in 1672 that a prism does not add colour to white light but separates the rays it already contains, each bent by a fixed amount, into an ordered series he named the spectrum. The referent is a physical fact about radiation: a measurable spread of energy over wavelength, read off an instrument. Later spectroscopy carried the same idea from visible light to the whole electromagnetic range. This meaning is about light and energy, not people or ideas, and it is the only one here whose spectrum you can photograph.[1]

Unit
A distribution of radiation intensity over wavelength or frequency
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Wavelength or frequency dispersed by a prism or grating and recorded as intensity, in spectroscopy

Clinical psychology

a dimensional view of a condition, such as autism, whose presentations vary by degree rather than discrete types.

A dimensional conception of a condition, on which presentations vary by degree rather than falling into a few discrete types. Wing and Gould reported in 1979 that social impairment, communication difficulty, and restricted activities co-occurred across a continuum of severity in children, and Wing later named this the autistic spectrum; DSM-5 then folded earlier separate diagnoses into a single autism spectrum disorder. The referent is the range of ways one condition presents across people, arranged on a graded axis. Here spectrum means a clinical continuum of a disorder, not a spread of light and not an arrangement of ideas. Nothing about wavelength survives the move.[2]

Unit
A graded range over which a condition's presentation varies
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Clinical assessment placing a person's presentation along a continuum of severity

Political science

the arrangement of political ideologies along one or more axes, most familiarly a left-right line.

The arrangement of political ideologies along one or more axes, most familiarly the left-right line inherited from where deputies sat in the 1789 French National Assembly. Downs modelled party competition in 1957 as movement along a single left-right dimension on which voters and parties take positions. The referent is a space of ideological positions, not a physical quantity and not a medical range. A voter's place on the political spectrum is a summary of their views, arrived at by argument and self-report, with no natural zero and no instrument to read it. It shares only the picture of an ordered line with the optical and clinical meanings.[3]

Unit
A position of an ideology or voter along an ideological axis
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Placement of voters and parties on a left-right dimension, by survey or spatial model

Telecommunications policy

the range of radio frequencies treated as a scarce economic resource, licensed to users and often auctioned.

The range of radio frequencies treated as a scarce, allocatable economic resource, licensed to users and increasingly assigned by auction. McMillan described in 1994 how the United States shifted from giving away spectrum rights to selling them, so that bands of frequency became property to be valued, divided, and traded. The referent is not the physics of radio waves but the legal right to transmit in a band, a resource an agency allocates and firms bid for. This is the same underlying frequencies as the physics meaning, renamed as an asset: here spectrum is something you own, not something you photograph.[4]

Unit
A licensed band of radio frequency held as an allocatable resource
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Bandwidth allocated and prices paid in spectrum licence auctions

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how spectrum sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

bandwidth3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three quantitiesideology6 fields · 10 citationsjingle · one name, six constructspolarization6 fields · 11 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Newton, I. (1672). A letter of Mr. Isaac Newton, Professor of the Mathematicks in the University of Cambridge, containing his new theory about light and colors. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 6(80), 3075–3087.
  2. Wing, L., & Gould, J. (1979). Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: Epidemiology and classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531288
  3. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.
  4. McMillan, J. (1994). Selling spectrum rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(3), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.3.145

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct