Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations

Where does resource collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningcompetitive advantagecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to resource is competitive advantage.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

resource4 CONSTRUCTSFirm resourceBARNEY · FIRM ASSETPersonal resourceHOBFOLL · COR THEORYSystem resourceCOFFMAN · OS RESOURCENatural resourceOSTROM · COMMON POOL

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Strategic management

A firm asset that yields advantage

In the resource-based view of the firm, a resource is an asset, capability, process, attribute, or piece of knowledge that a firm controls, and it can yield a sustained competitive advantage when it is valuable, rare, hard to imitate, and hard to substitute. Wernerfelt's 1984 A resource-based view of the firm reframed the firm as a bundle of such resources, and Barney's 1991 Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage set out those four conditions. The referent is a controllable business asset judged by the advantage it confers, not something a person protects under stress, an element inside a computer that a program waits for, or a stock of nature drawn from a shared pool.[1][2]

Unit
A single firm-controlled asset, capability, or piece of knowledge
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Judged against the value, rarity, inimitability, and non-substitutability of the asset, often through case study or firm-level indicators

Psychology

Something a person values and protects

In Conservation of Resources theory, a resource is anything a person values and strives to obtain, keep, and protect, including objects, personal traits, conditions, and energies. Hobfoll's 1989 Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress argued that stress arises when these resources are threatened, are lost, or fail to grow after a person invests in them. The referent is a valued personal or social holding whose loss drives strain, not a firm asset weighed for competitive advantage, an allocatable element inside a machine, or a natural stock harvested from a shared pool.[3]

Unit
A single valued object, condition, personal trait, or energy that a person holds
Recovery means
People invest resources to recover from loss and to gain more, though loss tends to outweigh gain in its impact
Measured by
Assessed through inventories of valued resources and by tracking resource loss and gain against reported stress

Computer science

A system element a process is given

In an operating system, a resource is a reusable or consumable system element, such as processor time, memory, a file, or a lock, that running processes request and hold while they execute. Coffman, Elphick, and Shoshani's 1971 System deadlocks analysed how competing processes acquire resources and how a cycle of processes each waiting on one another can freeze them all in deadlock. The referent is an allocatable element inside a machine, governed by contention and scheduling, not a firm asset held for advantage, a valued personal holding, or a stock of nature.[4]

Unit
A single allocatable element, such as a CPU slice, a memory block, or a lock
Recovery means
A resource is released back to the system when a process finishes with it, and preemption can reclaim one to break a deadlock
Measured by
Tracked by allocation and wait state, utilisation, and whether outstanding requests form a cycle that deadlocks

Ecology and resource economics

A natural stock people draw from

In ecology and resource economics, a resource is a stock of nature that people draw on, such as a fishery, forest, aquifer, or mineral deposit, classed as renewable or nonrenewable and, when access is open, as a common-pool resource that many users can deplete. Hardin's 1968 The tragedy of the commons warned that shared stocks tend to be overused, and Ostrom's 1990 Governing the commons showed that communities can sustain them through rules and monitoring. The referent is a physical stock of nature and the yield taken from it, not a firm asset, a valued personal holding, or an element inside a computer.[5][6]

Unit
A stock of nature and the flow harvested from it in a given period
Recovery means
A renewable stock regrows if harvest stays below its regeneration rate; a nonrenewable stock is used up and does not
Measured by
Assessed by stock size, harvest or extraction rate, regeneration rate, and the rules governing access

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how resource sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

resource-based view4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · a framework, not one constructcommons4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, from open access to common propertydeadlock3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  2. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  3. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
  4. Coffman, E. G., Elphick, M., & Shoshani, A. (1971). System deadlocks. ACM Computing Surveys, 3(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/356586.356588
  5. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  6. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct