Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations

Where does bandwidth collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three quantities Nearest construct by meaningmindsetcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to bandwidth is mindset.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

METAPHOR · 2013bandwidth3 CONSTRUCTSSignal processingSHANNON · HERTZ · BITS/SCognitive bandwidthSCARCITY · ATTENTIONControl systemsOGATA · CUTOFF FREQUENCY

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Signal processing

Bandwidth as frequency width or data rate

The width of a frequency band, measured in hertz, or, by extension, the rate at which a channel carries information, measured in bits per second. In Shannon's 1948 account the two are tied together: the capacity of a channel is the bandwidth times the logarithm of one plus the signal-to-noise ratio, so a wider band and a higher rate move together but are not the same quantity. Everyday usage collapses them, calling a fast connection "high-bandwidth" whether the constraint is spectral width or throughput. The referent is a physical channel and the number attached to it is an engineering measurement, not a description of anyone using the channel.[1]

Unit
Hertz, or bits per second
Recovery means
Not applicable; a property of a channel
Measured by
Spectral width of a band in hertz; channel capacity in bits per second

Behavioral economics

Cognitive bandwidth as finite mental capacity

The limited mental resource available for attention, planning, and self-control, which Mullainathan and Shafir borrow the engineering word for in their 2013 book Scarcity. On their account a pressing lack, of money or of time, occupies the mind and leaves less capacity for everything else, so scarcity itself taxes the faculty. Mani and colleagues gave the claim a measurement in Science the same year: sugarcane farmers scored worse on fluid-intelligence and executive-control tasks before harvest, when poor, than after, when paid, and low-income shoppers primed to think about a large expense showed the same drop. Nothing here is in hertz or bits per second; the word is a metaphor, and the quantity behind it is a change in test performance.[3][2]

Unit
A person's momentary mental capacity
Recovery means
Capacity returns when the demand on it is removed
Measured by
Performance on fluid-intelligence and executive-control tasks, such as Raven's matrices and a Stroop task, before and after inducing financial concern

Control engineering

Bandwidth as a system's responsive frequency range

The range of frequencies over which a control system, a sensor, or an instrument responds usefully to its input. As Ogata sets it out, the bandwidth of a closed loop is the frequency at which the output falls to a fixed fraction of its low-frequency value, conventionally the point three decibels down, and it fixes how fast the system can track a changing command and how much high-frequency noise it lets through. Here bandwidth is again a frequency, but the referent is a system's dynamic response rather than a communication channel: a wider bandwidth means a quicker, less filtered response, with the trade-off against noise that quickness always carries.[4]

Unit
Hertz, or radians per second
Recovery means
Not applicable; a property of a system's response
Measured by
The frequency at which the closed-loop magnitude response falls to −3 dB of its low-frequency value

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how bandwidth sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

entropy6 fields · 12 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsattention5 fields · 10 citationsjingle · one name, five constructscognitive load3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · load and workload, rarely cross-citedbandwidth tax1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone construct

References

  1. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  2. Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341(6149), 976–980. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238041
  3. Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Times Books.
  4. Ogata, K. (2010). Modern control engineering (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct