Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningtrainingcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to weight is training.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The downward force that gravity exerts on a body, equal to the body's mass multiplied by the local gravitational acceleration, and measured in newtons like any other force. Because it is a force, this weight changes with location: the same body weighs less on the Moon than on Earth, even though the amount of matter in it, its mass, does not change. Galili's 2001 Weight versus gravitational force traced how physics and physics teaching have separated this force from mass and from the reading of a scale. The referent is a force in newtons set by gravity, not a coefficient in a formula, a trained parameter in a network, or the total mass of a living body.[1]
A number attached to an observation to set how much it counts in a calculation, so that a weighted mean or total gives some cases more influence than others. In survey sampling the weight is often the inverse of a unit's probability of being selected, so that a case standing in for many similar cases is counted up to represent them all. Horvitz and Thompson's 1952 A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe gave the classic estimator built on these inverse probability weights. The referent is a dimensionless coefficient of importance chosen by the analyst or the sampling design, not a gravitational force, a trained network parameter, or the mass of a body.[2]
A learned number on a connection in a neural network that scales how much one unit's output contributes to the next unit's input: the collection of these weights is what the network stores and what training changes. Learning adjusts every weight a little at a time to reduce the error between the network's output and the target. Rumelhart, Hinton, and Williams's 1986 Learning representations by back-propagating errors showed how the error signal can be propagated backward to update these weights. The referent is a tunable parameter fitted by training, not a force from gravity, a fixed coefficient in a survey formula, or the mass of a body.[3]
The total mass of a living body, one of the most basic measurements in clinical care, recorded in kilograms and tracked over time as a marker of growth, nutrition, and health. It is combined with height in the body mass index, defined as weight divided by height squared, to screen for underweight and obesity across populations. Keys, Fidanza, Karvonen, Kimura, and Taylor's 1972 Indices of relative weight and obesity evaluated such weight based indices and named the body mass index. The referent is the mass of a body on a clinical scale, not a gravitational force in newtons, a coefficient in a weighted average, or a parameter learned by a network.[4]
Next
See how weight sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct