Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations

Where does density collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningdistributioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to density is distribution.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

density4 CONSTRUCTSMass densitySERWAY · MASS / VOLUMEProbability densityKOLMOGOROV · PDFPopulation densitySIBLY · HEADCOUNT / AREANetwork densityWASSERMAN · TIES/POSSIBLE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Physics and materials

Mass per unit volume

The amount of mass contained in a unit of volume of a substance, written as mass divided by volume and reported in kilograms per cubic metre. It is an intensive property, meaning a small chip of a pure material has the same value as a large block of it, so it identifies the material rather than the size of the sample, as set out in standard treatments such as Serway and Jewett's Physics for Scientists and Engineers (2018). The referent here is a physical ratio of matter to space, always carried in units of mass over volume, and it is unrelated to a curve whose area is a probability, a count of organisms over ground, or a fraction of possible links in a network.[1]

Unit
Kilograms per cubic metre, mass divided by the volume it occupies
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Found by weighing a sample and dividing by its measured or displaced volume, as in Archimedes' displacement method, or by pycnometry

Probability and statistics

A function whose integral is a probability

A function attached to a continuous random quantity whose integral over any region gives the probability of landing in that region, so its area, not its height, is the probability, and its value at a point can even exceed one. Built on Kolmogorov's 1933 axioms and made precise as a Radon and Nikodym derivative by Nikodym's 1930 theorem, it is a density of one measure with respect to another reference measure, most often length or volume, so it is defined only relative to that chosen measure. The referent is a rate of probability per unit of the reference measure, and it is emphatically not a mass per volume, a headcount over an area, or a share of realised ties.[2][3]

Unit
Probability per unit of the reference measure, so it integrates to one over the whole space
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated from data by histograms or kernel density estimation, or derived analytically by differentiating the cumulative distribution

Ecology and demography

Individuals per unit area or volume

The number of individuals of a population living in a unit of area or volume, a core demographic parameter that governs competition, resource use, and the rates at which a population grows or declines. Sibly and colleagues' 2005 study in Science showed across mammals, birds, fish, and insects that growth rate depends on this density, the signature of density dependence in population regulation. The referent is a count of living things scaled by the ground or water they occupy, a biological quantity, and it has nothing in common with a material's mass over volume, a probability curve's area, or the wiring fraction of a graph.[4]

Unit
Individuals per unit area or volume, for example animals per square kilometre
Recovery means
Density dependence can pull an over-crowded population back toward a carrying capacity as births fall and deaths rise
Measured by
Estimated by direct counts, quadrat sampling, mark and recapture, or distance sampling scaled to the area surveyed

Network science and sociology

Share of possible ties that exist

The proportion of the ties that could possibly exist among a set of actors that are actually present, computed as the number of observed links divided by the number of pairs, giving a number between zero and one. Wasserman and Faust's 1994 Social Network Analysis defines it as a basic measure of how knit together a whole network is, and Newman's 2003 review places the same ratio at the centre of complex network structure. The referent is a dimensionless fraction of realised connections in a graph, and it is a different thing from a mass over a volume, a probability spread over a line, or a headcount over a field.[5][6]

Unit
A dimensionless ratio from zero to one, observed ties divided by possible ties
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed from an adjacency matrix as edges divided by the maximum possible edges for the number of nodes

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how density sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

network4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsdistribution2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsconcentration4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2018). Physics for scientists and engineers (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  2. Kolmogorov, A. N. (1956). Foundations of the theory of probability (2nd English ed.). Chelsea Publishing.
  3. Nikodym, O. (1930). Sur une généralisation des intégrales de M. J. Radon. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 15, 131–179. https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-15-1-131-179
  4. Sibly, R. M., Barker, D., Denham, M. C., Hone, J., & Pagel, M. (2005). On the regulation of populations of mammals, birds, fish, and insects. Science, 309(5734), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110760
  5. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
  6. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct