Construct · 1 fields · 3 citations

axiom of choice: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a foundational axiom Nearest construct by meaningpreferencecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to axiom of choice is preference.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

axiom ofchoice1 CONSTRUCTAxiom of choiceZERMELO · CHOICE FUNCTION

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Mathematical logic

The set-theory axiom guaranteeing a choice function for any collection of nonempty sets

Ernst Zermelo introduced the axiom of choice in 1904 in Beweis, daß jede Menge wohlgeordnet werden kann (Proof that every set can be well-ordered), stating that for any collection of nonempty sets there exists a choice function, a rule that selects exactly one element from each set, even when the collection is infinite and no explicit recipe for choosing is available. The axiom is logically equivalent to two other cornerstone statements, Zorn's lemma and the well-ordering theorem, so a proof may invoke whichever form is most convenient. Its standing within standard set theory was settled in two stages: Kurt Gödel showed in 1938 that the axiom cannot be disproved from the other Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, and Paul Cohen showed in 1963 that it cannot be proved from them either, so the axiom is independent of that system. What makes the axiom of choice a landmark is that it lets a mathematician assert that a selection across infinitely many sets exists without exhibiting any procedure that builds it, a nonconstructive step that underlies large parts of analysis, algebra, and topology while remaining something one may assume or do without.[1][2][3]

Unit
A foundational axiom of set theory, asserting the existence of a choice function over any collection of nonempty sets
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified in a proof by its reliance on a choice function, Zorn's lemma, or the well-ordering theorem, forms shown equivalent within Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how axiom of choice sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

function5 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, five constructsset3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructscontinuum hypothesis1 fields · 4 citationsanchor · a standalone construct

References

  1. Zermelo, E. (1904). Beweis, daß jede Menge wohlgeordnet werden kann. Mathematische Annalen, 59(4), 514–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01445300
  2. Gödel, K. (1938). The consistency of the axiom of choice and of the generalized continuum-hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 24(12), 556–557. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.24.12.556
  3. Cohen, P. J. (1963). The independence of the continuum hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 50(6), 1143–1148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.50.6.1143

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct