Construct · 3 fields · 6 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningrobustnesscompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to breakdown is robustness.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The sudden onset of large electric current through a material that normally insulates, once the applied electric field passes a critical value and charge carriers multiply or tunnel across the gap. Zener's 1934 A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics described how a strong enough field can lift electrons across the forbidden energy gap of an insulator so that it abruptly conducts, and McKay's 1954 Avalanche breakdown in silicon traced the competing mechanism in which one fast carrier knocks loose others in a self-amplifying cascade. The referent is a physical failure of insulation at a threshold field, scaled in volts per unit thickness, and it has nothing to do with a society losing its ordering controls or a statistical estimator losing its resistance to bad data.[1][2]
In the study of collective action, the loosening or collapse of the everyday social ties and controls that normally keep people integrated and orderly, which some theories treat as the condition that releases protest, riot, or movement activity. Kornhauser's 1959 The politics of mass society argued that when the groups standing between the individual and the state weaken and people become socially unattached, they grow available for mass mobilisation, and Useem's 1998 review Breakdown theories of collective action gathered this family of accounts and set it against rival theories that credit stable organisation and resources instead. The referent is a change in the fabric of social order, gauged by indicators of disintegration and unrest, and it is not a physical failure of insulation or a numerical limit on an estimator.[3][4]
The largest fraction of a sample that can be replaced by arbitrary, even extreme, values before an estimator can be forced to give a useless answer, so a high value means the method tolerates many bad points. Hampel's 1971 A general qualitative definition of robustness introduced this limiting fraction as a way to rank how robust an estimator is, and Donoho and Huber's 1983 The notion of breakdown point gave the exact finite-sample version now in common use, under which the median withstands up to half the data being corrupted while the mean withstands none. The referent is a numerical tipping fraction for a statistical estimator, a pure proportion between zero and one half, and it shares nothing with insulation failing under a field or a society losing its ordering ties.[5][6]
Next
See how breakdown sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct