Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

capability-vulnerability paradox: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Strategic studies

the condition in which the digital technologies that make a military more capable also create vulnerabilities that can reward striking first.

In strategic studies, capability-vulnerability paradox refers to the condition in which the digital technologies that make a military more capable also create vulnerabilities that can reward striking first. This meaning comes from Schneider (2021) in Emerging Technologies and International Stability.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how capability-vulnerability paradox sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

condition2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs emerging technology1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone construct paradox3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

Schneider, J. (2021). The capability/vulnerability paradox and military revolutions: Implications for computing, cyber, and the onset of war. In Emerging Technologies and International Stability (pp. 21-43). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003179917-2

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct