Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

companions in guilt argument: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Ethics

the argument that rejecting moral facts would also require rejecting epistemic facts, which share the same features, so the rejection fails.

In ethics, companions in guilt argument refers to the argument that rejecting moral facts would also require rejecting epistemic facts, which share the same features, so the rejection fails. This meaning comes from Cuneo (2007) in The Normative Web.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how companions in guilt argument sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

argument3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs rejection4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs share2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

Cuneo, T. (2007). The Normative Web. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218837.001.0001

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct