Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

complex scientific testimony: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
complex scientifictestimony1 CONSTRUCTComplex scientificCOOPER · PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Psychology and law

how jurors respond to hard-to-follow expert evidence by leaning on cues like expert credentials rather than the content of the testimony.

In psychology and law, complex scientific testimony refers to how jurors respond to hard-to-follow expert evidence by leaning on cues like expert credentials rather than the content of the testimony. This meaning comes from Cooper (1996) in Law and Human Behavior.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how complex scientific testimony sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

complex4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructscooper1 fields · 2 citationsanchor · a standalone constructevidence2 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Cooper, J., Bennett, E. A., & Sukel, H. L. (1996). Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? Law and Human Behavior, 20(4), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01498976

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct