Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations

conformal: one construct, many systems

One name. One construct. Different systems. One map.

● invariant · one construct, three systems Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
angle-preservation applied to mapping the globeangle-preservation lifted to the spacetime metricconformal3 SYSTEMSConformal mapHOLOMORPHIC · ANGLE-KEEPConformal transformationMETRIC · RESCALINGConformal projectionMERCATOR · ORTHOMORPHIC

Spokes are the systems the one construct recurs in; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Complex analysis

A map that preserves angles between curves

In complex analysis a conformal map is a transformation that preserves the angle and the sense of rotation between any two curves meeting at a point, wherever it is locally invertible. The key result is that every holomorphic function with a non-vanishing derivative is conformal, which ties the analytic property of differentiability to a purely geometric one. Ahlfors's Complex analysis develops the theory, including the Riemann mapping theorem that any simply connected proper subset of the plane can be mapped conformally onto a disc. The referent is a locally angle-preserving (but generally not distance-preserving) transformation of the plane.[1]

Unit
Whether local angles are preserved (equivalently, a non-zero derivative)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Checked via the Cauchy–Riemann equations and a non-vanishing derivative at each point

General relativity

A rescaling of the metric that keeps light-cones fixed

In general relativity and differential geometry a conformal transformation multiplies the metric tensor by a positive, position-dependent factor, so that measured lengths change but angles and the null-cone (causal) structure of spacetime are left unchanged. Because the light-cones are preserved, conformal relations let physicists rescale and compactify spacetimes to study their causal structure and boundaries. Wald's General relativity treats conformal transformations and their role in causal structure and asymptotics. The referent is a scalar rescaling of the metric that holds angles and null directions invariant while altering scale.[2]

Unit
The conformal factor (positive scalar field) relating the two metrics
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified when two metrics differ by a positive scalar multiplier, leaving the null cones intact

Cartography

A projection that keeps small shapes true

In cartography a conformal (or orthomorphic) projection is one that preserves local angles and the shapes of small features, meaning the scale at any point is identical in every direction even though it varies from place to place across the map. The Mercator and the Lambert conformal conic are the classic cases, valued because a constant compass bearing plots as a straight line and because small shapes stay faithful. Snyder's Map projections: A working manual sets out the mathematics of these and other projections. The referent is a map transformation that sacrifices area fidelity to keep local angles and shapes correct. It is the same angle-preserving construct as in complex analysis, here realised on the curved Earth.[3]

Unit
Local angular and shape fidelity at a point on the map
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Confirmed when scale is equal in all directions at a point, so the Tissot indicatrix is a circle

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how conformal sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

loxodrome1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone constructprojection4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Ahlfors, L. V. (1979). Complex analysis: An introduction to the theory of analytic functions of one complex variable (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780070006577
  2. Wald, R. M. (1984). General relativity. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226870335
  3. Snyder, J. P. (1987). Map projections: A working manual (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1395). U.S. Government Printing Office. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1395

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct