Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

epistemic trespassing: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Epistemology

experts passing judgment on questions in fields where they lack the competence or evidence to speak with authority.

In epistemology, epistemic trespassing refers to experts passing judgment on questions in fields where they lack the competence or evidence to speak with authority. This meaning comes from Ballantyne (2018) in Mind.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how epistemic trespassing sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

authority4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs competence5 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, five constructs evidence2 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

Ballantyne, N. (2018). Epistemic Trespassing. Mind, 128(510), 367-395. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx042

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct