Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

ex-consequentia reasoning: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Clinical psychology

the tendency to infer that a situation is dangerous from one's own anxious feelings rather than from objective information.

In clinical psychology, ex-consequentia reasoning refers to the tendency to infer that a situation is dangerous from one's own anxious feelings rather than from objective information. This meaning comes from Arntz (1995) in Behaviour Research and Therapy.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how ex-consequentia reasoning sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

information4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs objective2 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs reasoning6 fields · 17 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

Arntz, A., Rauner, M., & Van den Hout, M. (1995). “If I feel anxious, there must be danger”: Ex-consequentia reasoning in inferring danger in anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(8), 917-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00032-s

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct