Construct · 1 fields · 3 citations

Fermi paradox: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningDrake equationcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to Fermi paradox is Drake equation.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

Fermiparadox1 CONSTRUCTFermi paradoxFERMI · WHERE IS EVERYBODY

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Astrobiology

The apparent contradiction between high estimates of extraterrestrial civilizations and the absence of any observed evidence

Enrico Fermi's 1950 lunchtime remark at Los Alamos, recounted by physicist Eric Jones in 1985, posed a plain question about extraterrestrial life: if the galaxy is old and vast and even a small fraction of its many stars host planets where technological civilizations arise, some should long ago have spread across it, so "Where is everybody?" The name and the first rigorous published argument came later, with Michael Hart's 1975 paper setting out why the complete absence of any observed extraterrestrial being or artifact on Earth is hard to reconcile with those expectations, unless such civilizations are rare, short-lived, or absent. The paradox is the tension between the high estimates for the number of communicating civilizations, of the kind tallied in the Drake equation, and the total lack of confirmed evidence or contact, a silence sometimes called the Great Silence. As a landmark it frames a large research program in astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI): each proposed resolution, from interstellar travel being impractical, to civilizations self-destructing, to Earth being deliberately unvisited, is a candidate answer to the one question rather than a rival meaning of the term. As Robert Gray noted in 2015, Fermi himself never published on the subject and the argument is not strictly a logical paradox, so the label is a historical convention for a well-defined problem.[1][2][3]

Unit
A named problem in astrobiology: the gap between the expected and the observed evidence of extraterrestrial civilizations
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Framed by contrasting probabilistic estimates of civilization counts, as in the Drake equation, against the null results of astronomical and radio searches (SETI)

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how Fermi paradox sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

argument3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsartifact2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsbeing3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Jones, E. M. (1985). "Where is everybody?" An account of Fermi's question (LA-10311-MS). Los Alamos National Laboratory.
  2. Hart, M. H. (1975). An explanation for the absence of extraterrestrials on Earth. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 16, 128–135.
  3. Gray, R. H. (2015). The Fermi paradox is neither Fermi's nor a paradox. Astrobiology, 15(3), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2014.1247

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct