Construct · 1 fields · 3 citations
One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.
● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningDrake equationcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to Fermi paradox is Drake equation.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Enrico Fermi's 1950 lunchtime remark at Los Alamos, recounted by physicist Eric Jones in 1985, posed a plain question about extraterrestrial life: if the galaxy is old and vast and even a small fraction of its many stars host planets where technological civilizations arise, some should long ago have spread across it, so "Where is everybody?" The name and the first rigorous published argument came later, with Michael Hart's 1975 paper setting out why the complete absence of any observed extraterrestrial being or artifact on Earth is hard to reconcile with those expectations, unless such civilizations are rare, short-lived, or absent. The paradox is the tension between the high estimates for the number of communicating civilizations, of the kind tallied in the Drake equation, and the total lack of confirmed evidence or contact, a silence sometimes called the Great Silence. As a landmark it frames a large research program in astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI): each proposed resolution, from interstellar travel being impractical, to civilizations self-destructing, to Earth being deliberately unvisited, is a candidate answer to the one question rather than a rival meaning of the term. As Robert Gray noted in 2015, Fermi himself never published on the subject and the argument is not strictly a logical paradox, so the label is a historical convention for a well-defined problem.[1][2][3]
Next
See how Fermi paradox sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct