Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

forensic conclusion language: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
forensicconclusion language1 CONSTRUCTForensic conclusionMCQUISTON-SURRETT · FORENSIC

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Forensic science

the wording forensic examiners use to state an identification, and how factfinders interpret claims of a match, similarity or likelihood.

In forensic science, forensic conclusion language refers to the wording forensic examiners use to state an identification, and how factfinders interpret claims of a match, similarity or likelihood. This meaning comes from McQuiston-Surrett (2009) in Law and Human Behavior.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how forensic conclusion language sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

identification6 fields · 9 citationsjingle · one word, six constructslikelihood3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructssimilarity3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. McQuiston-Surrett, D., & Saks, M. J. (2009). The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear. Law and Human Behavior, 33(5), 436-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9169-1

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct