Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations

Where does similarity collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningrepresentativenesscompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to similarity is representativeness.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

similarity3 CONSTRUCTSGeometric similarityEUCLID · SIMILAR FIGURESSimilarity measureJACCARD · COEFFICIENTJudged similarityTVERSKY · FEATURE CONTRAST

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Geometry

Same shape at any scale

In geometry, two figures are similar when they have the same shape but may differ in size: corresponding angles are equal and corresponding lengths stand in a fixed ratio, so one figure can be carried onto the other by uniform scaling together with rotation, translation, and reflection. Euclid's Elements (Book VI, circa 300 BCE) defined similar rectilinear figures by equal angles and proportional sides and built the theory of proportion that supports them. Here similarity is a yes-or-no relation between shapes, settled by exact proportion, and it is not a graded score of resemblance between data objects or a judgment made by a person.[1]

Unit
A pair of figures that either are or are not similar, with a single scale ratio when they are
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Established by proving that corresponding angles are equal and corresponding lengths hold a constant ratio, or by exhibiting a similarity transformation between the figures

Information retrieval and machine learning

a number measuring how alike two objects are from their features, scaled so identical objects score highest.

In data analysis, a similarity measure is a number that says how alike two objects are given their features, usually scaled so that identical objects score at the top and unrelated ones near the bottom. Jaccard's 1912 The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone introduced the first such coefficient, the ratio of shared attributes to total attributes between two samples, and Salton, Wong, and Yang's 1975 A vector space model for automatic indexing made the cosine of the angle between feature vectors the standard measure for comparing documents. Here similarity is a graded score computed from data and symmetric in its two inputs, which sets it apart from the exact shape relation of geometry and from the feature-weighted judgment a person reports.[2][3]

Unit
A score between two objects, often on a fixed range such as 0 to 1
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed from feature overlap or from the angle or distance between vectors, using coefficients such as Jaccard's ratio or the cosine measure

Cognitive psychology

the resemblance a person perceives between two things, a mental quantity that predicts how people generalize, sort and remember.

In cognitive psychology, similarity is the resemblance a person perceives between two things, treated as a mental quantity that predicts how people generalize, sort, and remember. Tversky's 1977 Features of similarity modeled it as a contrast of features: the judged similarity of two items rises with the features they share and falls with the features that set them apart, weighted by context and by which item is taken as the subject of the comparison. Because those weights can differ, this similarity is often asymmetric and can break the distance rules of a geometric space, so it is neither the exact shape relation of geometry nor the symmetric score of a data similarity measure.[4]

Unit
A person's rating of how alike two items are, in a given context
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Elicited by similarity ratings, sorting, and generalization or confusion data, and modeled by feature contrast or by multidimensional scaling

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how similarity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

analogy4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructscongruence4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsproximity3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Euclid. (circa 300 BCE/1908). The thirteen books of Euclid's Elements (Vol. 2, Book VI; T. L. Heath, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published circa 300 BCE)
  2. Jaccard, P. (1912). The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytologist, 11(2), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x
  3. Salton, G., Wong, A., & Yang, C. S. (1975). A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/361219.361220
  4. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct