Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningrepresentativenesscompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to similarity is representativeness.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In geometry, two figures are similar when they have the same shape but may differ in size: corresponding angles are equal and corresponding lengths stand in a fixed ratio, so one figure can be carried onto the other by uniform scaling together with rotation, translation, and reflection. Euclid's Elements (Book VI, circa 300 BCE) defined similar rectilinear figures by equal angles and proportional sides and built the theory of proportion that supports them. Here similarity is a yes-or-no relation between shapes, settled by exact proportion, and it is not a graded score of resemblance between data objects or a judgment made by a person.[1]
In data analysis, a similarity measure is a number that says how alike two objects are given their features, usually scaled so that identical objects score at the top and unrelated ones near the bottom. Jaccard's 1912 The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone introduced the first such coefficient, the ratio of shared attributes to total attributes between two samples, and Salton, Wong, and Yang's 1975 A vector space model for automatic indexing made the cosine of the angle between feature vectors the standard measure for comparing documents. Here similarity is a graded score computed from data and symmetric in its two inputs, which sets it apart from the exact shape relation of geometry and from the feature-weighted judgment a person reports.[2][3]
In cognitive psychology, similarity is the resemblance a person perceives between two things, treated as a mental quantity that predicts how people generalize, sort, and remember. Tversky's 1977 Features of similarity modeled it as a contrast of features: the judged similarity of two items rises with the features they share and falls with the features that set them apart, weighted by context and by which item is taken as the subject of the comparison. Because those weights can differ, this similarity is often asymmetric and can break the distance rules of a geometric space, so it is neither the exact shape relation of geometry nor the symmetric score of a data similarity measure.[4]
Next
See how similarity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct