Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does gambit collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
gambit2 CONSTRUCTSConversational gambitKELLER · 1979Gambit of the groupFRANKS ET AL. · 2009

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Linguistics / pragmatics

A small phrase that steers a conversation

In linguistics a gambit is a short routinised expression that a speaker uses to manage a conversation (to open a topic, signal agreement, buy time, or hand over the turn), such as “by the way” or “what I mean is.” Keller's 1979 paper Gambits: Conversational strategy signals named and classified these moves as signals that organise discourse rather than carry its main content. The referent is a strategic discourse marker studied in pragmatics, unrelated to a board sacrifice or a sampling assumption beyond the shared idea of an opening move.[1]

Unit
The conversational function a routinised phrase performs in organising talk
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by discourse analysis of where and how the expression manages topic, turn-taking, or stance

Behavioural ecology

Assuming animals seen together are associating

In behavioural ecology the “gambit of the group” is the simplifying assumption that animals observed in the same group at the same time are genuinely associating with one another, so that group membership can stand in for a social tie when building animal social networks. Franks, Ruxton, and James's 2009 study Sampling animal association networks with the gambit of the group tested how well this shortcut recovers true association patterns. The referent is a methodological sampling assumption in social-network research, named by analogy to a calculated opening risk, and unrelated to a chess opening or a conversational signal.[2]

Unit
How faithfully group co-membership recovers the underlying association network
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Evaluated by comparing networks inferred from group co-membership against known or simulated true associations

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how gambit sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

agreement4 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsanalogy4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsassociation4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Keller, E. (1979). Gambits: Conversational strategy signals. Journal of Pragmatics, 3(3–4), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90032-8
  2. Franks, D. W., Ruxton, G. D., & James, R. (2009). Sampling animal association networks with the gambit of the group. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64(3), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0865-8

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct