Construct · 1 fields · 3 citations

Gresham's law: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningquantity theory of moneycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to Gresham's law is quantity theory of money.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

Gresham'slaw1 CONSTRUCTGresham's lawMACLEOD · BAD DRIVES GOOD

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Economics

The principle that overvalued money drives undervalued money out of circulation

The economist Henry Dunning Macleod, in The Elements of Political Economy (1858), attached the name of the Tudor financier Sir Thomas Gresham to a monetary principle usually stated as "bad money drives out good": when two coins are required by law to trade at the same face value but differ in the worth of the metal they contain, people spend the debased or overvalued coin and hold back, melt, or export the full-weight one, so the poorer money stays in circulation and the better money disappears. The observation is older than the name, appearing in the work of Nicolaus Copernicus and Nicole Oresme and, in comic form, as far back as Aristophanes, but Macleod's label is the one that endured. Arthur Rolnick and Warren Weber (1986) sharpened the claim by showing that it holds only under specific conditions, chiefly a legally fixed exchange rate between the two monies together with costs that keep people from freely trading them at their true values, and that where those conditions fail the good money can circulate alongside the bad. The construct is distinctive as one of the earliest formal statements in monetary economics of how a legal price control, here an official exchange rate between two forms of money, changes which of them people are willing to part with. In modern usage the same phrase is sometimes extended by analogy to non-monetary settings such as markets where quality is hidden, a link recorded on the adverse selection page and not treated as a separate construct here.[1][2][3]

Unit
A monetary regularity: which of two legally equal-valued monies remains in circulation and which is hoarded, melted, or exported
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified from monetary records showing full-weight or higher-metal-content coin leaving circulation while debased or overvalued coin remains, under a fixed legal exchange rate

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how Gresham's law sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

adverse selection4 names · 4 citationsjangle · hidden information skews the marketinflation3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsanalogy4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Macleod, H. D. (1858). The elements of political economy. Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, and Roberts.
  2. Rolnick, A. J., & Weber, W. E. (1986). Gresham's law or Gresham's fallacy? Journal of Political Economy, 94(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/261368
  3. Selgin, G. (1996). Salvaging Gresham's law: The good, the bad, and the illegal. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28(4), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.2307/2078075

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct