Construct · 2 fields · 3 citations

Where does icon collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningiconicitycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to icon is iconicity.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

icon2 CONSTRUCTSPeircean iconPEIRCE · SIGN BY LIKENESSIconic memoryNEISSER · ICONIC MEMORY

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Semiotics and philosophy

A sign that resembles its object

In Charles Sanders Peirce's 1885 On the Algebra of Logic: A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation, an icon is a sign that stands for its object by resembling it, one of three sign types alongside the index, which points to its object, and the symbol, which stands for its object by convention. A photograph, a diagram, or a scale model counts as iconic because its own qualities mirror the thing it represents. Here the referent is a relation between a sign and its object defined by likeness, not a painted holy image, a fading visual memory, or a small picture on a screen.[1]

Unit
One sign standing for its object by resemblance
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by analysing how a sign relates to its object: by likeness, by physical connection, or by convention

Cognitive psychology

The brief visual sensory memory store

Ulric Neisser's 1967 Cognitive Psychology named the icon: a very short-lived visual memory that briefly holds a nearly complete image of what the eyes just saw before it fades. Michael Coltheart's 1980 review Iconic memory and visible persistence refined the account and separated the distinct processes that partial-report experiments had grouped together. Here the referent is a fleeting internal store in a person's visual system, timed in milliseconds, and it has nothing to do with a sign type, a holy image, or a screen control.[2][3]

Unit
One brief visual trace, lasting a fraction of a second
Recovery means
The trace decays within a few hundred milliseconds unless attention transfers it onward
Measured by
Estimated by partial-report experiments that cue one row of a briefly shown display and compare recall against whole-report

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how icon sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

sign4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsimage4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsrepresentation7 fields · 9 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Peirce, C. S. (1885). On the algebra of logic: A contribution to the philosophy of notation. American Journal of Mathematics, 7(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2369451
  2. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts. ISBN 9780131396678
  3. Coltheart, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27(3), 183–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204258

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct