Construct · 4 fields · 8 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningunioncompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to inclusion is union.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In set theory a set is included in another when every one of its members also belongs to the second, written as A being a subset of B: the smaller collection is contained in the larger, and the relation orders sets by containment. George Boole's 1854 An Investigation of the Laws of Thought treated the statement that all of one class falls within another as a basic relation of his algebra of logic, and Giuseppe Peano's 1889 Arithmetices principia gave the containment relation between classes its formal symbol. The referent is an abstract relation between collections, either holding or not for a given pair, and it has nothing to do with a droplet sealed in a rock, a body lodged in a cell, or a person made to feel part of a group.[1][2]
A mineral inclusion is a small body of another material, a solid crystal, a droplet of liquid, or a bubble of gas, that was trapped inside a growing crystal and sealed there as it formed. Henry Clifton Sorby's 1858 On the microscopical structure of crystals first read these trapped droplets as records of the conditions under which a mineral grew, founding the study of fluid inclusions, and Edwin Roedder's 1984 Fluid Inclusions made their analysis a standard tool of geochemistry. The referent is a physical pocket of foreign matter frozen inside a mineral, examined under a microscope, and it is unrelated to a relation between sets, an aggregate inside a cell, or belonging in a workplace.[3][4]
A cellular inclusion body is a discrete, densely packed mass that forms inside a cell, often an aggregate of viral particles or of misfolded protein, visible under the microscope as a distinct body in the nucleus or cytoplasm. Edwin V. Cowdry's 1934 The problem of intranuclear inclusions in virus diseases gave the first systematic account and classification of these bodies in infected cells, and Ron Kopito's 2000 Aggresomes, inclusion bodies and protein aggregation extended the term to the aggregates that cells build when they cannot clear misfolded protein. The referent is a material structure that accumulates within a single cell, located and counted by staining, and it differs from a relation between sets, a droplet trapped in a rock, or the inclusion of people in a group.[5][6]
In organizational research inclusion is the degree to which an employee feels accepted as a full member of a work group while keeping what makes them distinct, able both to belong and to remain themselves. Michal Mor Barak and David Cherin's 1998 A tool to expand organizational understanding of workforce diversity built one of the first measures of the inclusion and exclusion an individual experiences at work, and Lynn Shore and colleagues' 2011 Inclusion and diversity in work groups drew the scattered work together into a model defining inclusion through belonging and uniqueness. The referent is a person's experienced standing within a group, reported on survey scales, and it is not a relation between sets, a droplet sealed in a crystal, or a body lodged in a cell.[7][8]
Next
See how inclusion sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct