Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does myth collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
myth2 CONSTRUCTSMythBARTHES · SEMIOTICSMythBASCOM · FOLKLORE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

1957Myth1965Myth
2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Semiotics

term used by Barthes for a second-order sign system in which images and objects carry naturalised ideological meanings in popular culture.

In semiotics, myth refers to term used by Barthes for a second-order sign system in which images and objects carry naturalised ideological meanings in popular culture. This meaning comes from Barthes (1957) in Mythologies.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Folklore

a prose narrative that its tellers hold to be a true account of what happened in the remote past, usually sacred and set in an earlier world.

In folklore, myth refers to a prose narrative that its tellers hold to be a true account of what happened in the remote past, usually sacred and set in an earlier world. This meaning comes from Bascom (1965) in The Journal of American Folklore.[2]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how myth sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

etiology / aetiology2 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsprose narrative genres1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone constructbinary opposition1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone construct

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Éditions du Seuil. ISBN 9782020025829
  2. Bascom, W. (1965). The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives. The Journal of American Folklore, 78(307), 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/538099

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct