Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does perpetuity collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningremaindercompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to perpetuity is remainder.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

perpetuity2 CONSTRUCTSPerpetuity (C/r)GORDON · CASH-FLOW STREAMRule vs perpetuitiesLEACH · REMOTE VESTING

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Finance

a stream of equal cash payments continuing without end, valued as the payment divided by the discount rate.

In finance a perpetuity is a stream of equal cash payments that continues without end, and its whole value collapses to one formula: the payment divided by the discount rate, C over r. Gordon's 1959 Dividends, Earnings, and Stock Prices valued a share as the present worth of a dividend stream continuing forever, giving the growing-perpetuity result P = D/(k - g) that reduces to D/k when the payment is level. Securities of this shape have really existed, such as the British consols and other perpetual bonds that promised a fixed coupon and never came due. This referent is a cash-flow object priced as a present sum, not a legal limit on how long property may be tied up, and not an institutional fund an organisation chooses to keep forever.[1]

Unit
One endless stream of equal payments, valued at C divided by r
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Priced as a present value: the periodic payment divided by the discount rate, or by (r minus g) for a growing stream

Property law

A property interest that vests too remotely

In property law a perpetuity is a future interest in property that might take effect too far off in time, and the common-law rule against perpetuities voids any such interest. The classic statement, credited to John Chipman Gray and popularised in Leach's 1938 Perpetuities in a Nutshell, is that no interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, within twenty-one years after some life in being at the creation of the interest. The rule exists to stop an owner from controlling property forever from the grave by attaching conditions that could spring up in the distant future. This referent is a restriction on remote vesting, the near-opposite of something prized for lasting forever: it is not a cash-flow stream priced at C over r, nor a fund an institution decides to preserve permanently.[2]

Unit
One future interest, judged valid or void by whether it must vest in the perpetuity period
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Tested against the perpetuity period: a life in being plus twenty-one years, or a fixed number of years under reform statutes

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how perpetuity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

annuity3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsbond2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsbequest2 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Gordon, M. J. (1959). Dividends, earnings, and stock prices. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 41(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927792
  2. Leach, W. B. (1938). Perpetuities in a nutshell. Harvard Law Review, 51(4), 638–671. https://doi.org/10.2307/1333874

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct