Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

Popper-Miller argument: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Formal epistemology

argument that the probabilistic support evidence gives a hypothesis beyond what it deductively entails is always negative, so inductive probability is impossible.

In formal epistemology, Popper-Miller argument refers to argument that the probabilistic support evidence gives a hypothesis beyond what it deductively entails is always negative, so inductive probability is impossible. This meaning comes from Popper (1983) in Nature.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how Popper-Miller argument sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

argument3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs evidence2 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs hypothesis2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

Popper, K., & Miller, D. (1983). A proof of the impossibility of inductive probability. Nature, 302(5910), 687-688. https://doi.org/10.1038/302687a0

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct