Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

rule-following paradox: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
rule-followingparadox1 CONSTRUCTRule-following paradoxBOGHOSSIAN · PHILOSOPHY OF

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Philosophy of language

skeptical argument that no fact about a speaker's past use or mind fixes what rule they follow, threatening facts about meaning.

In philosophy of language, rule-following paradox refers to skeptical argument that no fact about a speaker's past use or mind fixes what rule they follow, threatening facts about meaning. This meaning comes from Boghossian (1989) in Mind.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how rule-following paradox sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

argument3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsfollow1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone constructparadox3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Boghossian, P. A. (1989). The Rule-Following Considerations. Mind, XCVIII(392), 507-549. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xcviii.392.507

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct