Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

systematicity argument: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Cognitive science

the argument that because the capacity to think some thoughts brings the capacity to think structurally related ones, cognition needs combinatorial representations.

In cognitive science, systematicity argument refers to the argument that because the capacity to think some thoughts brings the capacity to think structurally related ones, cognition needs combinatorial representations. This meaning comes from Fodor (1988) in Cognition.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how systematicity argument sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

language of thought1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone construct argument3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs capacity5 fields · 8 citationsjingle · one word, four limits

References

Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28(1-2), 3-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct