Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexedSpokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In linguistics, agglutination is a way of building words in which each grammatical meaning is carried by its own separable affix stacked onto a stem, so a word segments cleanly into a chain of morphemes each with one function, as in Turkish or Finnish. Plank's 1999 Split morphology: How agglutination and flexion mix examines agglutination as one pole of morphological typology against fusional inflection and how real languages blend the two. The referent is this transparent, one-meaning-per-affix morphological structure, a property of grammar that has nothing to do with antibodies clumping cells beyond the shared image of gluing units together.[1]
In immunology, agglutination is the visible clumping that results when a multivalent antibody cross-links its antigen displayed on the surface of cells or particles, bridging them into aggregates, the basis of blood typing and many serological tests. Price's 2001 Agglutination techniques for detecting antigen–antibody reactions reviews how this cross-linking is read out to detect and quantify antibody or antigen. The referent is antibody-mediated cross-linking of particulate antigen into clumps, measured by the highest antibody dilution still giving visible aggregation, and it is a separate construct from a grammatical word-building pattern, sharing only the meaning of sticking things together.[2]
Next
See how agglutination sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct