Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does apologia collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two opposite constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
apologia2 CONSTRUCTSApology (speech act)SEARLE · EXPRESS REGRETApologia (genre)WARE & LINKUGEL · DEFENSE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Linguistic pragmatics

a speech act expressing the speaker's regret or acknowledgement of fault for a past act affecting the hearer.

In linguistic pragmatics, an apology is a speech act whose point is to express the speaker's regret or acknowledgement of fault for a past act that affected the hearer. Searle's Speech Acts sets out the illocutionary-act framework in which apologizing counts as an act that expresses a psychological state rather than describing the world. The referent is the everyday act of saying sorry, an admission that something went wrong, which is the ordinary meaning of the word in modern English.[1]

Unit
An utterance expressing regret or acknowledgement of fault
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Analysed by its felicity conditions and by the strategies speakers use to perform and intensify it

Rhetoric

A formal defense, not an admission

In rhetoric, an apologia is a formal speech or writing in self-defense, a justification of one's conduct or beliefs rather than an admission of fault, the meaning carried by Plato's Apology of Socrates and by Newman's Apologia Pro Vita Sua. Ware and Linkugel's They spoke in defense of themselves analyses the recurring strategies, such as denial, bolstering, differentiation, and transcendence, by which speakers answer attacks on their character. The referent is a defensive genre of discourse, close to the opposite of saying sorry, which is what makes the shared modern word "apology" a genuine trap.[2]

Unit
A sustained discourse defending or justifying one's conduct or beliefs
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Analysed by the defensive postures and strategies the speaker adopts in answer to accusation

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how apologia sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

act2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructscharacter4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsdefense3 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521096263
  2. Ware, B. L., & Linkugel, W. A. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383176

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct