Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations

Where does transcendence collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningegocompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to transcendence is ego.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

transcendence4 CONSTRUCTSBeyond experienceKANT · BEYOND EXPERIENCETranscendental numLIOUVILLE · NON-ALGEBRAICDivine transcendenceOTTO · WHOLLY OTHERSelf-transcendenceMASLOW · SELF-TRANSCEND

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Philosophy

What lies beyond possible experience

In Immanuel Kant's 1781 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Critique of Pure Reason), the transcendent is what lies beyond the limits of any possible human experience, so that reason cannot reach it through the senses. Kant separated the transcendent, which oversteps those limits, from the transcendental, his term for the conditions that make experience possible in the first place, and he argued that claims about transcendent objects such as the soul or the world as a whole fall outside the reach of knowledge. Medieval writers had used the related word for concepts crossing all categories, but Kant fixed this new meaning, and later idealist and phenomenological thinkers kept the core idea: that which goes past the bounds of experience. Here transcendence is a boundary of human knowing, not a kind of number, a name for God, or a movement of the self.[1]

Unit
A claim or object judged to fall beyond or within possible experience
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Argued philosophically, by testing whether a concept can be given in any possible experience

Mathematics

A number that is no polynomial's root

A transcendental number is a real or complex number that is not the root of any nonzero polynomial with rational coefficients, so it cannot be captured by any finite algebraic equation. Joseph Liouville's 1844 note to the French Academy proved that such numbers exist and built the first explicit examples, now called Liouville numbers. Charles Hermite's 1873 Sur la fonction exponentielle then showed that the constant e is transcendental, and Lindemann proved the same for pi in 1882. The word here labels a property of a number defined by algebra, and it has nothing to do with a limit of experience, a name for the divine, or a state of the person.[2][3]

Unit
A single number, classified as algebraic or transcendental
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Proven case by case, by showing no rational-coefficient polynomial has the number as a root

Religious studies

God as wholly beyond the world

Divine transcendence is the idea that God or the sacred stands wholly beyond the created world and beyond ordinary categories of thought. Rudolf Otto's 1917 Das Heilige (translated as The Idea of the Holy) named this the experience of the holy as the ganz andere, the wholly other: something felt as awesome and beyond comprehension rather than reasoned into. The theological idea that God surpasses the world is far older than Otto, but his account gave the modern study of religion an influential vocabulary for it, later set against divine immanence, the idea of God present within the world. Here transcendence names a relation between the divine and the world, not a bound on knowledge, a class of number, or a peak of human growth.[4]

Unit
A described relation of the divine to the world, from wholly transcendent to fully immanent
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Studied through texts, theology, and reports of religious experience, not by physical measurement

Humanistic psychology

Rising beyond the self toward something higher

Self-transcendence is the idea that a person can reach beyond concern for the self toward other people, causes, or a larger whole. In his late writings, gathered in the 1971 book The Farther Reaches of Human Nature, Abraham Maslow placed self-transcendence above self-actualization at the top of his hierarchy of human needs, describing it as identification with something greater than the individual ego. Koltko-Rivera's 2006 review recovered this later version of the hierarchy, which textbook summaries often leave out. Here transcendence is a direction of human motivation and growth, not a limit of philosophy, a property of a number, or a name for God.[5][6]

Unit
A person's degree of orientation beyond the self
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed with self-report scales of self-transcendence and related motivation

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how transcendence sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

number3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructslimit3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsapologia2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two opposite constructs

References

  1. Kant, I. (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of pure reason]. Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.
  2. Liouville, J. (1844). Sur des classes très étendues de quantités dont la valeur n'est ni algébrique ni même réductible à des irrationnelles algébriques. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 18, 883–885.
  3. Hermite, C. (1873). Sur la fonction exponentielle. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 77, 18–24.
  4. Otto, R. (1917). Das Heilige: Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen. Trewendt & Granier.
  5. Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. Viking Press.
  6. Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow's hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10(4), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.302

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct