Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does comprehension collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
comprehension2 CONSTRUCTSComprehension of a termARNAULD & NICOLE · 1662Reading comprehensionKINTSCH · 1988

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Logic & philosophy

The attributes a concept packs in

In the logic of ideas, the comprehension of a concept is the full set of attributes it contains, the marks that together make it what it is, as opposed to its extension, the things it applies to. Arnauld and Nicole's Logic, or, The art of thinking (1662) drew this contrast: the comprehension of "triangle" includes having three sides and three angles, while its extension is every triangle there is. The referent is the internal attribute-content of a concept, later also called its intension, and it has nothing to do with understanding a passage of text or a syntax for building lists beyond the shared root of "grasping together."[1]

Unit
The set of attributes contained in a concept
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Analysed by listing the defining marks a concept contains and contrasting them against the objects in its extension

Reading & education

Building a coherent model of a text

In reading research and education, comprehension is the process of constructing meaning from text: the reader integrates the words on the page with prior knowledge to build a coherent mental representation of what the passage is about. Kintsch's 1988 construction-integration model describes how readers first generate a loose network of propositions and candidate meanings and then let activation settle so that context-appropriate meanings survive and a connected situation model forms. The referent is an understanding built in a reader's mind, measured by what they can recall, infer, and apply, and it is a different construct from the attribute-content of a concept in logic or a list-building notation in programming.[2]

Unit
The depth and coherence of the mental model a reader builds from a text
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed through recall, question answering, inference tasks, and summaries that reveal how well the text was integrated

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how comprehension sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

reading2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsactivation4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsautonomy6 fields · 14 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Arnauld, A., & Nicole, P. (1996). Logic, or, The art of thinking (J. V. Buroker, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1662) ISBN 9780521483940
  2. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct