Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningrhythmcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to genre is rhythm.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In literary study, a genre is a kind of literary work grouped by shared form and convention, such as tragedy, epic, or the novel: works are sorted into genres by the features they hold in common, and a genre carries expectations about structure, tone, and subject. The idea runs from Aristotle's division of poetry into kinds through to modern schemes that try to map the whole field of writing. Northrop Frye's 1957 Anatomy of Criticism set out to organise literature into a small set of recurring modes and forms, treating genre as an ordering scheme for the entire body of literary work. Here the thing being named is a category on the page, defined by textual convention, and not a way of acting, a type of everyday speech, or a label a machine assigns to a song.[1]
In rhetoric and applied linguistics, a genre is not a fixed literary form but a recurring, socially shared way of getting something done with language. Carolyn Miller's 1984 Genre as Social Action argued that a genre is defined by the typified action it performs in response to a situation that keeps coming up, such as a letter of recommendation or an apology, rather than by its surface shape. John Swales's 1990 Genre Analysis studied genres as communicative events shared by a community, showing how a research article is built from a regular sequence of rhetorical moves. On this view the thing being named is a pattern of situated action, tied to a purpose and a group of users, and it can change as the situation changes. That is a very different object from a static literary category or a label pinned to an audio file.[2][3]
For the linguist and literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin, a speech genre is one of the relatively stable types of utterance that grow up within each sphere of human activity, from a casual greeting to a military command to a scientific paper. His essay in Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, written in the early 1950s and published in English in 1986, argued that we do not speak in sentences alone but in whole utterances shaped to fit a familiar type, and that we take in these types about as readily as we take in our native grammar. Genres in this usage run from short everyday exchanges to elaborate written forms, and each carries a typical content, style, and structure. The thing being named is a customary shape of speech or writing tied to a setting, close to the rhetorical view but framed as a fact about language use rather than a literary category or a classifier's tag.[4]
Next
See how genre sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct