Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

consequence argument: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
consequenceargument1 CONSTRUCTConsequence argumentVAN INWAGEN · PHILOSOPHY OF

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Philosophy of action

the argument that if determinism is true our acts are consequences of the laws and the remote past, which are not up to us, so free will is impossible.

In philosophy of action, consequence argument refers to the argument that if determinism is true our acts are consequences of the laws and the remote past, which are not up to us, so free will is impossible. This meaning comes from Van Inwagen (1975) in Philosophical Studies.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how consequence argument sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

action3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsargument3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsconsequence2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two carriers

References

  1. Van Inwagen, P. (1975). The incompatibility of free will and determinism. Philosophical Studies, 27(3), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01624156

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct