Construct · 4 names · 5 citations

Where does entrepreneurial exit collide?

Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.

● jangle · one construct, many names Nearest construct by meaningentrepreneurial intentioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to entrepreneurial exit is entrepreneurial intention.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

person vs firm splitevent vs anticipated planentrepreneurialexit4 NAMESFounder exitDETIENNE · FOUNDER EXITExit routesDETIENNE ET AL · ROUTESFirm vs founderWENNBERG · FIRM VS SELFExit intentionDETIENNE · EXIT INTENT

Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Exit as founder departure

The founder's separation from the firm they created

DeTienne's 2010 Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process defined entrepreneurial exit as the process by which the founders of privately held firms leave the firm they helped to create, removing themselves in varying degrees from the primary ownership and decision-making structure. On this reading exit is the closing stage of the entrepreneurial process, as consequential as founding, and it centres on the person of the founder rather than on the fate of the company. This meaning fixes the referent on the entrepreneur's own departure, which is distinct from the harvest route that carries value out, from the question of whether the firm itself survives or dies, and from a founder's mere plan to leave one day.[1]

Unit
One founder's departure from ownership and leadership of the firm they created
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Observed as a change in the founder's ownership stake and role, tracked over the venture's life

Exit as harvest and route

The mechanism of departure and the value it realises

When exit is scoped as a strategy, the question becomes which route the founder takes out. DeTienne, McKelvie, and Chandler's 2015 Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies sorted these routes into three broad types: financial harvest through an initial public offering or a sale to another firm, stewardship through family succession or a sale to employees or managers who will preserve the business, and voluntary cessation through discontinuance or liquidation. Wennberg and DeTienne's 2014 What do we really mean when we talk about 'exit'? review stressed that these routes differ so much that treating them as one outcome hides more than it reveals. This meaning fixes the referent on the mechanism of departure and the value it does or does not realise, which is a narrower question than the founder's separation in general, than whether the firm lives on, or than the founder's stated plan.[3][5]

Unit
A route out of the firm: harvest sale, succession, buyout, or liquidation
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Classified by the transaction type recorded at exit, from public offering to liquidation

Exit as firm exit

The firm's sale or closure, distinguished from the person leaving

Wennberg, Wiklund, DeTienne, and Cardon's 2010 Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit drew the sharpest line on this page, between the exit of the entrepreneur and the exit of the firm. They crossed two dimensions, whether the firm was performing well or poorly and whether it was sold on or shut down, to yield four routes: harvest sale and harvest liquidation for strong firms, and distress sale and distress liquidation for weak ones. The key correction is that a founder can leave a thriving company, and a failing company can dissolve while its founder stays to the end, so exit-as-the-person-leaving and exit-as-the-firm-ending are not the same event. This meaning insists on separating who leaves from what happens to the business, a distinction that the broad label of exit tends to blur.[2]

Unit
A firm-level exit route, crossing firm performance with sale versus closure
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Coded from firm performance and disposition at exit into harvest or distress, sale or liquidation

Exit intention

The anticipated exit plan, held before any exit occurs

DeTienne and Cardon's 2012 Impact of founder experience on exit intentions scoped exit not as an event that has happened but as an intention held in advance: the route a founder anticipates taking when they eventually leave. They found that founders' background, including prior entrepreneurial and industry experience and their age and education, shapes which exit they expect, well before any exit occurs. This meaning fixes the referent on a forward-looking plan rather than a realised departure, so it can be measured in founders who have not exited at all. It is therefore distinct from an actual founder departure, from the route ultimately taken, and from the firm's ultimate fate, none of which the plan determines on its own.[4]

Unit
A founder's anticipated future exit route, stated before any exit
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Self-reported expected exit route among current founders, before exit occurs

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how entrepreneurial exit sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

succession4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsacquisition4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsentrepreneurial intention4 names · 5 citationsjangle · rival models, one construct

References

  1. DeTienne, D. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.004
  2. Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D. R., & Cardon, M. S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.001
  3. DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Chandler, G. N. (2015). Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.007
  4. DeTienne, D. R., & Cardon, M. S. (2012). Impact of founder experience on exit intentions. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9284-5
  5. Wennberg, K., & DeTienne, D. R. (2014). What do we really mean when we talk about 'exit'? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613517126

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct