Construct · 2 fields · 4 citations

Where does stage collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningdevelopmentcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to stage is development.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

stage2 CONSTRUCTSGeologic stageD'ORBIGNY · ROCK UNITDevelopmental stagePIAGET · MENTAL STAGE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Geology and stratigraphy

A body of rock formed during an age

A body of rock laid down during one age of Earth's history, the basic working unit of the chronostratigraphic scale that geologists use to line up rocks of the same age around the world. Alcide d'Orbigny introduced the idea of the stage, the French étage, in his 1849 to 1852 Cours élémentaire de paléontologie et de géologie stratigraphiques, naming units such as the Toarcian and the Bajocian after localities; Gradstein and Ogg's 2020 account of the chronostratigraphic scale gives the modern definitions and boundaries. The referent is the actual rock formed in a span of time, not the span itself, and it is distinct from a stage for performance, a rocket section, or a step in cognitive growth.[1][2]

Unit
One body of rock representing a single age, bounded by defined lower and upper limits
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Fixed by a defined boundary point in a reference rock section and correlated by fossils and isotope dating

Developmental psychology

a qualitatively distinct period in one ordered series of thinking stages that every child passes through.

A qualitatively distinct period in the growth of thinking, one of an ordered series that every child passes through in the same order, each marked by a characteristic way of reasoning. Jean Piaget's 1936 La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant traced the earliest of these stages, in which intelligence grows out of sensing and moving; David Feldman's 2004 reassessment revisits how sharp and how universal those stages really are. The referent is a phase of a person's cognitive development, measured by what a child can and cannot yet do, and it is unrelated to a platform for actors, a rocket module, or a layer of rock.[3][4]

Unit
One developmental period, defined by the reasoning a child in it can perform
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by standardised reasoning and conservation tasks and by observation of how children solve problems

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how stage sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

development1 fields · 2 citationsanchor · a standalone constructperformance6 fields · 8 citationsjingle · one word, five performancescognition4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. d'Orbigny, A. (1849–1852). Cours élémentaire de paléontologie et de géologie stratigraphiques (Vols. 1–2). Paris: Victor Masson.
  2. Gradstein, F. M., & Ogg, J. G. (2020). The chronostratigraphic scale. In F. M. Gradstein, J. G. Ogg, M. D. Schmitz, & G. M. Ogg (Eds.), Geologic time scale 2020 (pp. 21–32). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00002-4
  3. Piaget, J. (1936). La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant [The origins of intelligence in children]. Delachaux et Niestlé.
  4. Feldman, D. H. (2004). Piaget's stages: The unfinished symphony of cognitive development. New Ideas in Psychology, 22(3), 175–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.11.005

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct