Construct · 1 fields · 3 citations
One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.
● anchor · a standalone macroeconomic construct Nearest construct by meaningtrapcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to liquidity trap is trap.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
John Maynard Keynes introduced the liquidity trap in his 1936 book The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, describing a state in which interest rates have fallen so low that people prefer to hold on to cash rather than lend it or buy bonds, so any new money the central bank supplies is simply hoarded instead of pushing rates down further. John Hicks formalized the idea in 1937 within his IS-LM model, a standard diagram of how interest rates and total output settle into balance, where the trap appears as a flat stretch in which extra money no longer lowers the rate. Paul Krugman revived the concept in 1998 to explain Japan's prolonged slump, arguing that once short-term interest rates reach zero a central bank can no longer stimulate spending by cutting them and must reach for other tools. The construct is distinctive because it names the boundary at which conventional monetary policy stops working, the point where the policy rate is already at or near zero and lowering it can add no further stimulus.[1][2][3]
Next
See how liquidity trap sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct