Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexedSpokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In the philosophical and theological tradition love is not one thing but a family of distinct relations, classically the Greek quartet of storge (affection), philia (friendship), eros (romantic love), and agape (selfless or charitable love). Lewis's The four loves is a well-known modern treatment that keeps these meanings apart and examines how each works and how each goes wrong. The referent is a value-laden relation of care or attachment analysed by kind, utterly distinct from a tennis score of nothing and distinct too from the single measurable construct psychologists model.[1]
In psychology love is treated as a measurable relational construct. Sternberg's 1986 A triangular theory of love decomposes it into three components, intimacy, passion, and decision/commitment, whose combinations define kinds such as romantic, companionate, or consummate love. The referent is a structured psychological state between people, assessed by scales, and although it shares its object with the philosopher's analysis it is handled as one quantifiable construct rather than a family of named loves, and has nothing to do with a zero in tennis.[2]
Next
See how love sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct