Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

neurolaw: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
neurolaw1 CONSTRUCTNeurolawGREENE · LAW AND NEUROSCIENCE

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Law and neuroscience

the study of how brain science bears on legal responsibility, arguing it will shift intuitions about free will and retribution more than it changes legal doctrine.

In law and neuroscience, neurolaw refers to the study of how brain science bears on legal responsibility, arguing it will shift intuitions about free will and retribution more than it changes legal doctrine. This meaning comes from Greene (2004) in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how neurolaw sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

doctrine1 fields · 2 citationsanchor · a standalone constructseries3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsshift4 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1775-1785. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct