Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexedSpokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In statistics, an ogive is the cumulative frequency curve of a distribution: the running total of observations plotted against value, producing the characteristic elongated S-shape from which medians, quartiles, and percentiles can be read off. Galton's 1875 Statistics by intercomparison, with remarks on the law of frequency of error introduced this cumulative construction and borrowed the architectural word for its sweeping profile. The referent is a graphical summary of a distribution's cumulative counts, and it is a wholly different thing from the nose of a shell or the bands on a glacier, tied to them only by the shared S- or arch-like shape the word originally named.[1]
In glaciology, ogives are the arcuate light-and-dark bands that sweep down a glacier below an icefall, each pair of bands recording one year's passage of ice through the fall as faster summer flow and slower, snowier winter flow leave alternating texture and colour. Goodsell, Hambrey, and Glasser's 2002 Formation of band ogives and associated structures at Bas Glacier d'Arolla, Valais, Switzerland links the banding to the strain and ablation history of the ice. The referent is a periodic surface structure in flowing ice, measured as wavelength and offset per year, and it is unrelated to a statistical curve or a projectile's nose beyond the common bowed shape that gave all three the name.[2]
Next
See how ogive sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct