Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

relative frequency effect in morphology: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Morphology

the finding that a complex word more frequent than its base tends to be processed as a whole and is less decomposable.

In morphology, relative frequency effect in morphology refers to the finding that a complex word more frequent than its base tends to be processed as a whole and is less decomposable. This meaning comes from Hay (2001) in Linguistics.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how relative frequency effect in morphology sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in Collider Export BibTeX Report this entry

Nearby constructs

base3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs complex4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs frequency4 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

Hay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative? Linguistics, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.041

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct