Construct · 2 fields · 4 citations

Where does runoff collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningfloodingcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to runoff is flooding.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

runoff2 CONSTRUCTSSurface runoffMULVANEY · OVERLAND FLOWRunoff electionDUVERGER · SECOND BALLOT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Hydrology and civil engineering

Water flowing over the land surface

The part of rain or snowmelt that flows across the land into streams and rivers instead of soaking into the ground. Mulvaney's 1851 On the use of self-registering rain and flood gauges gave the first formula tying rainfall to the peak flow leaving a catchment (the rational method), and Horton's 1933 The role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle explained runoff as the rainfall left over once the soil can no longer absorb it. The referent is moving water on the land, counted as a depth or a flow rate, and it has nothing in common with a second round of an election or a closed book of insurance claims.[1][2]

Unit
A depth or volume of water leaving a catchment, or a flow rate such as cubic metres per second
Recovery means
Water returns to the system by later infiltration and slow baseflow between storms
Measured by
Gauged at a stream cross-section, or estimated from rainfall, catchment area, and a runoff coefficient

Political science and electoral systems

A second-round majority election

A second round of voting held between the leading candidates when no one wins an outright majority in the first round, so the winner is chosen by a majority of a narrowed field. Duverger's 1951 Les partis politiques was the classic study of how this two-round majority rule shapes the number of parties, and Bouton's 2013 A theory of strategic voting in runoff elections modelled how voters behave when a runoff is expected. The referent is a voting procedure and its effect on parties and candidates, not water crossing a field or an insurer winding down its policies.[3][4]

Unit
One electoral contest decided in two rounds, per office and election
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Studied through the vote shares across the two rounds, turnout, and the number of candidates and parties

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how runoff sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

election1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone constructerosion4 fields · 9 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsprecipitation4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Mulvaney, T. J. (1851). On the use of self-registering rain and flood gauges in making observations of the relations of rainfall and flood discharges in a given catchment. Transactions of the Institution of Civil Engineers of Ireland, 4.
  2. Horton, R. E. (1933). The role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 14(1), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR014i001p00446
  3. Duverger, M. (1951). Les partis politiques. Armand Colin.
  4. Bouton, L. (2013). A theory of strategic voting in runoff elections. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1248–1288. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.4.1248

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct