Construct · 1 fields · 4 citations
One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.
● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningagencycompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to structuration is agency.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Next
See how structuration sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct
Sociology and social theory
The recursive duality by which social structure both shapes and is reproduced through human agencyAnthony Giddens introduced structuration in Central Problems in Social Theory (1979) and developed it fully in The Constitution of Society (1984) as a way to dissolve the long-standing opposition between social structure and human agency. Structuration names the recursive process in which the rules and resources that make up social structure both guide people's action and are themselves produced and reproduced by that very action, a relationship Giddens called the duality of structure, meaning that structure is at once the medium and the outcome of the practices it organizes. On this account structure has no existence apart from the ongoing activities of knowledgeable actors and the memory traces that let them carry those activities forward, so it is continually reconstituted rather than fixed. The construct is a landmark because it reframes a foundational question of social theory, whether society is best explained from the top down by structures or from the bottom up by individuals, as one continuous process, and it has since been operationalized in fields such as information systems, where it grounds accounts of how technology use and organizational practice shape each other over time.[1][2][3][4]