Construct · 3 names · 4 citations
Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.
● jangle · one executive backing, many names Nearest construct by meaningvendor supportcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to top management support is vendor support.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The organizational context of Tornatzky and Fleischer's technology-organization-environment framework treats top management support as a key internal driver of whether a firm adopts an information technology: senior executives who grasp the innovation, signal that it matters, and free up budget and people lower the organizational barriers to adoption. Low, Chen, and Wu's 2011 Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption placed top management support among eight TOE factors and found that, alongside relative advantage, firm size, and competitive pressure, it shaped high-tech firms' decisions to adopt cloud computing. The referent is executive backing scored at the level of the adopting firm, and the adoption of the technology is the outcome it is meant to predict.[1][2]
In the information systems implementation and success literature, top management support is one of the most frequently named critical success factors, the backing without which a new system is held to stall regardless of its technical merits. Sharma and Yetton's 2003 The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation argued that the usual main-effects claim is too simple, and their meta-analysis showed that management support matters far more when the implemented system carries high task interdependence than when it does not. The referent is the same executive backing, but here the criterion is implementation success rather than the initial decision to adopt, and the effect is contingent rather than uniform.[3]
This is the field of labels rather than a separate theory: the same executive backing travels under senior management commitment, executive sponsorship, and management championship, and the champion literature gives the variant its sharpest form. Beath's 1991 Supporting the information technology champion studied fifteen IT champions and the information, technical, and political support they needed to drive an initiative through, casting the backing as an individual advocate rather than a diffuse organizational climate. Whether the construct is written as top management support, sponsorship, commitment, or championship shifts the emphasis, from resourcing to advocacy to endorsement, while the referent, a powerful insider putting weight behind the technology, stays in place.[4]
Next
See how top management support sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct