Construct · 1 fields · 2 citations
One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.
● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningfine-tuningcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to anthropic principle is fine-tuning.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
The cosmologist Brandon Carter introduced the anthropic principle in 1974, in a paper on large-number coincidences in cosmology, arguing that any statement about the universe must allow for the fact that we, the observers making it, exist within that universe and could only have arisen in a place and time that permits observers. He drew a distinction still used today between a weak version, which treats the values we measure for physical quantities as biased by the requirement that our location support observers, and a strong version, which holds that the universe itself must have properties allowing observers to develop at some stage. The book-length treatment by John Barrow and Frank Tipler in 1986, The anthropic cosmological principle, collected the surrounding physics and gave the idea its standard reference. The principle is invoked to address why the observed values of certain physical constants and cosmological parameters fall in the narrow ranges that permit stars, chemistry, and life: on this reasoning such values are partly a selection effect, meaning that observers can only find themselves in a universe, or a region of one, whose parameters already allow observers to exist. It is a principle about observational selection rather than a measurable quantity, so it constrains which explanations of apparent fine-tuning are admissible instead of predicting a specific number.[1][2]
Next
See how anthropic principle sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct