Construct · 2 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, two levels Nearest construct by meaningattentioncompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to attention-based view is attention.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
What a firm does depends on what its decision-makers attend to, and what they attend to is set less by their own minds than by the structures around them. Ocasio's 1997 Towards an attention-based view of the firm made attention a property of the organization rather than of any one manager: the firm's rules, resources, communications, and the concrete situations it puts people in channel where scarce attention goes, so the same executive attends to different issues in different roles. This is not a person concentrating harder; it is an organization structurally distributing and situating attention across its channels. Ocasio's 2011 Attention to attention later separated this organizational meaning from the many others the word carries. The referent here is a firm's agenda, produced by its architecture, not a spotlight inside a single head.[1][2]
The idea that attention is a scarce resource an organization allocates comes from the Carnegie tradition that the attention-based view grew out of. Because managers cannot attend to everything at once, March and Simon's 1958 Organizations and Cyert and March's 1963 A behavioral theory of the firm treated the firm's routines, goals, and search procedures as devices that decide which problems get looked at and in what order. Attention here is sequential and rationed: the firm attends to one goal, then another, and shifts focus when performance falls short. This is where organizational attention gets its meaning as something allocated by structure rather than chosen freely. Ocasio's view is a direct descendant, making the channelling of attention its central mechanism.[3][4]
Next
See how attention-based view sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct