Construct · 2 fields · 4 citations

Where does attention-based view collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two levels Nearest construct by meaningattentioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to attention-based view is attention.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

attention-basedview2 CONSTRUCTSAttention-based viewOCASIO 1997 · THE FIRMCarnegie traditionCARNEGIE · ALLOCATION

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Strategic management

the view that a firm's rules, resources, and situations, not managers' minds alone, channel where its scarce attention goes.

What a firm does depends on what its decision-makers attend to, and what they attend to is set less by their own minds than by the structures around them. Ocasio's 1997 Towards an attention-based view of the firm made attention a property of the organization rather than of any one manager: the firm's rules, resources, communications, and the concrete situations it puts people in channel where scarce attention goes, so the same executive attends to different issues in different roles. This is not a person concentrating harder; it is an organization structurally distributing and situating attention across its channels. Ocasio's 2011 Attention to attention later separated this organizational meaning from the many others the word carries. The referent here is a firm's agenda, produced by its architecture, not a spotlight inside a single head.[1][2]

Unit
A firm's allocation of decision-makers' attention across issues
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Traced through the issues named in agendas, filings, and communications, and through the structural positions and procedures that channel them

Behavioral theory of the firm

attention as a scarce resource a firm rations, with routines and goals deciding which problems get looked at.

The idea that attention is a scarce resource an organization allocates comes from the Carnegie tradition that the attention-based view grew out of. Because managers cannot attend to everything at once, March and Simon's 1958 Organizations and Cyert and March's 1963 A behavioral theory of the firm treated the firm's routines, goals, and search procedures as devices that decide which problems get looked at and in what order. Attention here is sequential and rationed: the firm attends to one goal, then another, and shifts focus when performance falls short. This is where organizational attention gets its meaning as something allocated by structure rather than chosen freely. Ocasio's view is a direct descendant, making the channelling of attention its central mechanism.[3][4]

Unit
The order and priority in which an organization attends to problems and goals
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Inferred from decision routines, problem-driven search, and shifts of focus that follow shortfalls against goals

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how attention-based view sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

attention5 fields · 10 citationsjingle · one name, five constructsbounded rationality4 names · 5 citationsjangle · limited minds, four programsupper echelons3 names · 5 citationsjangle · the firm reflects its top team

References

  1. Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.3.CO;2-B
  2. Ocasio, W. (2011). Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22(5), 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0602
  3. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall.
  4. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct