Construct · 1 fields · 5 citations

central limit theorem: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningnormalcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to central limit theorem is normal.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

centrallimit theorem1 CONSTRUCTCentral limit thmDE MOIVRE · NORMAL LIMIT

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Probability theory

Sums or averages of many independent random quantities converge to a normal distribution

Abraham de Moivre first derived a version of this result in 1733, showing that the count of successes in many independent trials (a binomial count, such as the number of heads in repeated coin tosses) is closely approximated by the smooth bell-shaped normal curve, a case Pierre-Simon Laplace extended and sharpened in his 1812 Théorie analytique des probabilités, giving what is now called the de Moivre-Laplace theorem. The general statement, that the sum or average of a large number of independent random quantities tends toward a normal distribution almost regardless of how each individual quantity is distributed, was placed on rigorous footing by Aleksandr Lyapunov in 1901 and by Jarl Waldemar Lindeberg in 1922, and George Polya gave the theorem its enduring name, the central limit theorem, in 1920. In plain terms, when many small, independent effects add up, their combined total settles into the familiar bell curve, which is why that curve recurs so widely across measurement and error. What makes the theorem a landmark is its universality: it explains why the normal distribution appears across physics, biology, and the social sciences, and it underwrites much of classical statistical inference, including the confidence intervals and significance tests that rely on the approximate normality of estimates.[1][2][3][4][5]

Unit
A limit theorem in probability theory describing the asymptotic distribution of standardized sums or means of independent random variables
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Stated and proved as a mathematical theorem under stated conditions; assessed empirically through the convergence of standardized sample sums or means to the standard normal distribution, checked with normal quantile plots and goodness-of-fit tests

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how central limit theorem sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

variance4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructscase2 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, two constructscoin2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. de Moivre, A. (1738). The doctrine of chances: Or, a method of calculating the probabilities of events in play (2nd ed.). H. Woodfall.
  2. Laplace, P.-S. (1812). Théorie analytique des probabilités. Courcier.
  3. Lyapunov, A. M. (1901). Nouvelle forme du théorème sur la limite de probabilité. Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, 12(5), 1–24.
  4. Lindeberg, J. W. (1922). Eine neue Herleitung des Exponentialgesetzes in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 15(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01494395
  5. Pólya, G. (1920). Über den zentralen Grenzwertsatz der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und das Momentenproblem. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 8(3–4), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206525

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct